Subnautica 2 Guide Hub Guides, Map, Database, Tools

Community reports

Help keep Subnautica 2 guides useful after patches and real runs.

This hub collects correction paths, reader reports, contribution rules, and review priorities so the site looks and behaves like a maintained guide project, not a frozen article dump.

Use this page for public reports and correction flow

Open Community when you want to report a stale guide, send route proof, suggest a missing page, or see how reports turn into visible maintenance. If you only need the correct mailbox, use Contact. If you want source rules or publishing boundaries, use Editorial Policy.

Community

Use this page when the report should become part of the site’s public maintenance trail or review queue.

Contact

Use direct email when you already know the issue type and want the fastest correction, map-proof, or partnership path.

Reader reports

Use structured report pages when the issue needs screenshots, route evidence, or a clearer review trail.

Editorial policy

Use the policy page when you want to understand source order, review standards, ad boundaries, or what the site refuses to publish.

Choose the right path

Different messages need different handling.

Your issue Best page What to include Review priority
A guide is wrong after a patch Correction path Page URL, changed detail, patch or build context. High when it affects route safety, resources, co-op, or systems.
A route, map, or danger zone does not match your run Map proof format Screenshot, route note, landmark, and where the old advice failed. High because route errors can waste active runs.
A page has repeated or poor visuals Reader reports Page URL and which image, crop, or diagram feels wrong. Medium unless it blocks reading or causes confusion.
A useful guide is missing Contribute The player problem, when it happens, and what answer would help. Medium, higher if many players hit the same blocker.
You want to know how the site makes decisions Editorial policy No report needed; read source order, review rules, and boundaries. Trust and review background.

Community standards

Reports should improve guides, not create noise.

Specific beats long

One page link and one concrete mismatch is more useful than a broad complaint about the whole site.

Proof helps route pages

Map, danger, resource, and base-location reports are easier to verify with a screenshot or route note.

Patch context matters

If a problem appeared after an update, say so. Patch-sensitive pages move first in review.

No unsafe requests

The site does not handle downloads, cheats, account services, unlockers, private files, or unofficial support.

What changes after reports

Good feedback should leave a visible maintenance trail.

Step 1 The report is matched to one page or one guide cluster.

Route, resource, co-op, and system issues are grouped by the pages most likely to mislead active players.

Step 2 The guide gets a practical fix, not just a cosmetic edit.

If a route is stale, the next link, table, diagram, or stop rule should also change so the reader can act on it.

Step 3 The update tracker records the maintenance pattern.

Public update notes make the site look alive and give returning players a reason to trust newer pages first.

Community depth

What the report hub should decide before a reader sends another note.

This page should make the report path feel useful, not noisy. Good reports are specific enough to become a fix, and the page should tell readers what proof helps most before they send anything.

Quick answer
  • Send one page, one problem, one proof note.
  • Use screenshot or route evidence when the issue is about movement or danger.
  • Put patch context in the first line if the page changed after an update.
Common mistakes
  • Sending a broad complaint instead of a fixable page-level note.
  • Mixing report feedback with account or platform support.
  • Leaving out the current build or route context for a stale guide.